Cases 31 - 40 of 216
Brooks v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline J. Brooks
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sturgis v. Warden of WCI et al
as 8:2021cv00098
Defendant:
CO II Piel, Sgt. Sgt. Davis, Head of Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Carrington Sturgis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thomas Brooks, III v. Kevin Spiegel
as 20-6437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS J. BROOKS, III, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN SPIEGEL, in his individual capacity and his official capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority, dba Erlanger Health System
ABBOTT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2021cv01026
Defendant:
MR. TEJADA, J. BROOKS, MS. BARFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD S. ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeAnthony Brooks v. C.M.C et al
as 2:2020cv10374
Defendant:
Mike Dawson, Aaron Collins, C.M.C and others
Plaintiff:
DeAnthony J. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus Brooks, Jr. v. Donald Sawyer, et al
as 20-14336
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD SAWYER, Dr., JP CARNER and E. SALEMA, Dr. PsyD.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS J. BROOKS, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BROOKS v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv01735
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH GROUP DISABILITY PLAN and RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TONYA J BROOKS and TONYA J. BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Brooks v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2020cv00337
Defendant:
E. Salema, Donald Sawyer and JP Carner
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Brooks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
