Cases 31 - 40 of 74,768
Matthew Jones v. Pigeon Forge, TN Police Department
as 24-5485
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
PIGEON FORGE, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Jones v. USA
as 5:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Staci Jones
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Cardwell et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Treyshawn L. Jones
Defendant:
Andre Cardwell, Bradley Hansford, D. Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
TED HICKS and GRAND LAKE LLC
Defendant:
United States, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Col. Cullen Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kimber #257691 v. Killough et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kimber #257691
Defendant:
Norma Killough, Barbra Storeym, Craig Schopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Jones v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04059
Plaintiff:
Penelope Jones
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
