Cases 31 - 40 of 439
Phillips et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
De Lois Phillips, Amy Leanne Phillips, Laura Kylene Sublett and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robinson v. Kallis
as 1:2023cv00110
Petitioner:
Charles Antwan Robinson
Respondent:
S Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERKINS v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
ERNIE PERKINS
Respondent:
S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. KALLIS
as 2:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
MARCUS R. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PARKS v. KALLIS
as 2:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
KYLE MAURICE PARKS
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clarence Schreane v. Steve Kallis
as 23-1677
Applicant:
CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS, Warden
Unowsky v. Thomas et al
as 4:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Kallie Unowsky
Defendant:
Payton McKenna Thomas and Brian Daniel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
