Cases 31 - 40 of 2,458
Martin v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lowell Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kern et al v. Stubhub, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Lowell Kern and Joseph Ball
Defendant:
Stubhub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
United States of America v. City of Lowell, Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10290
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Wilson v. Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA, Farm Credit Mid-America, FLCA, Farm Credit Mid-America, PCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cottongim et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00401
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Cottongim, Kyle Allen Cadwallader, Keith Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Not Yet Classified:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GABEL v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERRY GABEL
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
