Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Protect Orange County v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm
as 17-3966
Petitioner:
Protect Orange County, Pramilla Malick, Sarah E. Burns and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Millennium Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
New York State Department of E v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm
as 17-3770
Petitioner:
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Respondent:
Millennium Pipeline Company, L.L.C. and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
CPV VALLEY, LLC
Movant:
Sarah E. Burns, Amanda King, Melody Brunn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv08490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Huynh et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 4:2017cv02977
Plaintiff:
Hieu Huynh and Amy Huynh
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Victoria Malick
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Malick v. Quincy Police Dep't
as 16-2243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YVETTE MALICK
Defendant - Appellee:
QUINCY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01507
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212 Injunctive Relief from IRS Lien
Riverkeeper, Inc., et al v. FERC
as 16-1103
Petitioner:
Riverkeeper, Inc., Reynolds Hill Inc., Sierra Club Lower Hudson Chapter and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Malick v. Quincy Police Department
as 1:2016cv10008
Plaintiff:
Yvette Malick
Defendant:
Quincy Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
