Cases 31 - 40 of 2,380
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-14175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MELTON et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv05148
Plaintiff:
TYSHA MELTON and ELIACIN JUARBE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF ROCHELLE BILAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 4:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
Melinda Jo Melton
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tennille Melton v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv10496
Plaintiff:
Tennille Melton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MELTON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
TINA M. MELTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Melton
as 1:2023cv10060
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Matthew Melton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Joshua Garton v. W. Crouch, et al
as 23-6002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA GARTON
Defendant / Appellee:
W. RAY CROUCH, DAVID RAUSCH, BRADLEY NEALON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
