Cases 31 - 40 of 1,444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Christian Mata v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 23-3280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTIAN MATA
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Mayo #285576 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02469
Plaintiff:
Leslie M Mayo
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Duvenhage, Unknown Galvez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Valerio v. Genesis Oilfield Services et al
as 1:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Todd Lopez and Lorena Mata
Defendant:
Genesis Oilfield Services and Alejandro Beltran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Mata Rivero v. Durkee et al
as 2:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Galiana C. Mata Rivero
Defendant:
Jacob S. Durkee and WMF Powersports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Juan Mata Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05679
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Mata, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Batton v. Dimmer et al
as 1:2023at00933
Plaintiff:
Mario Batton
Defendant:
D Dimmer, A. Zarate, P. Permejo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Batton v. Dimmer et al
as 1:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
Mario Batton
Defendant:
D Dimmer, A. Zarate, P. Permejo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
