Cases 31 - 40 of 264
Gorski v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02123
Plaintiff:
Krissy Ann Gorski
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Dr. Reyna, T. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Dr. Reyna, T. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. O'Connor et al
as 0:2022cv02121
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Patrick T. O'Connor, J. Stanek, Mistelle Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Andre Matevousian, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Acevedo v. USA
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
William Roe Acevedo
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-1176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDGAR NELSON PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, CUNDIFF, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Shabazz v. Tuttoilmondo et al
as 1:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
Sabir Shabazz
Defendant:
A. Tuttoilmondo, L. Adams, B. True and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TROYA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
DANIEL TROYA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rowland v. Matevousian
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Rowland
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv01719
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alexander King
Defendant:
Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul, Guy Pagli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
