Cases 31 - 40 of 3,873
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Juan Mejia-Moran v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1313
Petitioner:
JUAN RAMON MEJIA-MORAN and J.J.M.A.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Perales Jr. v. Mejia et al
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Rene Perales Jr.
Defendant:
Cesar Mejia, Brandon Fisher, David A. Boshofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edgar Zuniga-Mejia v. Godwin, et al
as 24-11089
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ZUNIGA-MEJIA
Defendant:
GODWIN, FILIPCZACK, GRACEVILLE CF WARDEN and others
Cervantes v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Linda Cervantes
Defendant:
Unknown Parties named as: John Doe Corporations I-X - an Arizona entity doing business as El Guapo Envios, Jose L Mejia Torres, Unknown Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mejia v. US Bank
as 3:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Graciela H Mejia
Defendant:
US Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
(PS) Ramos Rodriguez v. Torres et al
as 2:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
J. Jesus Ramos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Maria Xochitl Mejia Torres, Rebeca Ramirez, Marisol Milian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mejia v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mejia
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
