Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Tate
as 1:2014mc00025
Petitioner:
Michael Tate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tate v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2013cv03596
Plaintiff:
Michael Tate
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Warren et al v. Dollar General Stores, Inc et al
as 4:2011cv00722
Plaintiff:
Eddie Warren and Aimee Warren
Defendant:
Dollar General Stores, Inc , Mike Lankford , Ronald Fessenden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Franklinton Police Dept et al
as 2:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lazandy Daniels
Defendant:
Franklinton Police Department, Michael Tate and Daniel Norsworthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Franklinton Police Dept et al
as 3:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lazandy Daniels
Defendant:
Franklinton Police Dept, Daniel Norsworthy and Michael Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Behm et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02728
Plaintiff:
William P. Behm, Darlene Kay Bell, Angelo P. Bennice and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tate et al v. Restaurant Technologies, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02076
Plaintiff:
Michael Tate, Michael Tate, Michael Tate and others
Defendant:
Restaurant Technologies, Inc., Restaurant Technologies, Inc., Restaurant Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Type:
Other Statutes
Tate v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv00253
Plaintiff:
Michael Tate
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and T. Balasz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
