Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Wiley v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wesley Wiley
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Dwight McKay, Yellowstone County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Peter Moote, Esq.
as 11-80079
Respondent:
In re: PETER MOOTE, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 25, 1979,
Moots v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Joann Moots
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moot v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2010cv02423
Plaintiff:
Diane Moot
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Benjamin Moots v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-13285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN N MOOTS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SANDEEP RAHANGDALE, T. BLAKENSHIP and others
MOOTS v. MCNEIL
as 4:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN N MOOTS
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moote et al v. Eli Lilly And Company et al
as 2:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kennard W. Moote and Janet Carole Moote
Defendant:
Eli Lilly And Company and Burcham C. Fuqua, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv03538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2007cv00879
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT H. SIMMONS, JR. and BETSY L. MOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Moote et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2007cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kennard W. Moote, Kennard W. Moote and Kennard W. Moote
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and Burcham C. Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
