Cases 31 - 40 of 16,721
Johnson et al v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L.G. Johnson, Jerry A. Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas Rutledge, Joshua Canavan, Mary Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Elizabeth Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rhonda Carter v. Nancy Berryhill
as 20-2380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA T. CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Middleton v. Berryhill
as 2:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Middleton
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv05793
Plaintiff:
Janice Annita Romero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yoakum v. Berryhill
as 3:2020cv00824
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Sherri Deanne Yoakum
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fields v. Berryhill
as 20-3760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jim R. Fields
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Travis Carr v. Andrew Saul
as 20-2226
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration and NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS X. CARR
Dixon v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2020cv03719
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ann Dixon
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SCHWARTZ v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv05539
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
DENNIS JAMES SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
