Cases 31 - 40 of 172
Sweat v. Roberts et al
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Defendant:
Mrs. Beulah G. Roberts and Office of the Clerk of Court of Clarendon County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jabbar v. Office of the Clerk, Richard Nagel et al
as 2:2021cv05571
Plaintiff:
Hakimah Jabbar, r
Defendant:
Office of the Clerk, Richard Nagel and Judge Michael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
JOHN DOE v. BUNT
as 5:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
DAVID W BUNT and DAVID W BUNT United States District Court Office of the Clerk, Middle District of Georgia doing business as CLERK OF US COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. Cogan et al
as 1:2021cv06705
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
Judge Brian Cogan and USDC EDNY Office of the Clerk of Court, All Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Richardson
as 21-1365
Petitioner:
DALE J. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BLEVINS, Officer, JONES, Officer, IMMIGRATION CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Officer FNU Blevins, Officer FNU Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Blevins, Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv02208
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Blevins, Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv00697
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Officer FNU Blevins, Officer FNU Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
