Cases 31 - 40 of 22,498
Smith v. Sailer
as 3:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Oliver D. Smith
Defendant:
Steve Sailer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
OLIVER v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Pollard, Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Wesley M Pollard, Sr.
Respondent:
Lonnie Oliver, Samuel M. Sanguedolce and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MOORE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
MARCUS MOORE
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00266
Defendant:
Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, Tulsa Public Schools, TPS and others
Plaintiff:
Paulette Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant:
Anthony Brown, Neil Leikach, Peggy Glascoe Geigher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2403 Constitutionality of State Statutes
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
