Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Oyelakin v. Reno et al
as 1:2012cv08951
Plaintiff:
Mutiu Adesina Oyelakin
Defendant:
Janet Reno, Harold R. Johnston, Vigo County Superior Court Division 1, Terre-Haute Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roseboro v. Pike County Jail(INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00362
Plaintiff:
Steven Roseboro
Defendant:
Pike County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Sephus v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-60244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MICHAEL SEPHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PIKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, PIKE COUNTY JAIL and others
Osbey v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Tramain Donta Osbey
Defendant:
Randy Smith and Pike County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chester v. Smith
as 3:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
Darex Antiono Chester
Defendant:
Randy Smith and Pike County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sephus v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00050
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Sephus
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Pike County Circuit Court, Pike County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sephus v. Miss. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00684
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael Sephus
Defendant:
Miss. Dept. of Corrections, Pike County Circuit Court, Pike County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Pike County Jail et al
as 6:2011cv06057
Plaintiff:
Tina Morgan
Defendant:
Pike County Jail, Preston Glen and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Pike County Jail et al
as 4:2011cv00575
Plaintiff:
Tina Morgan
Defendant:
Pike County Jail, Preston Glen and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Defendant:
Russell Thomas, Olivia Pearson, Pike County Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
