Cases 31 - 40 of 4,620
Eitemiller v. On Q Financial LLC
as 2:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Brian Eitemiller
Defendant:
On Q Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Freeman v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11289
Plaintiff:
Jibrail Q Freeman
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Feathers v. On Q Financial LLC
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Jack Feathers
Defendant:
On Q Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Petteway v. Municipality of New London, et al
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
Municipality of New London, Jeffrey Nichols and New London Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway v. Department of Correction
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Bright v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10833
Petitioner:
COREY Q. BRIGHT
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
