Cases 31 - 40 of 220,918
Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy et al v. Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy and Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority
Cross Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard, Inc., 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEWARD et al v. LUDDEN et al
as 3:2024cv06295
Plaintiff:
BARRY SEWARD, TRUDE SHERROD-POLAN and DOROTHY M. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CONSTANCE LUDDEN, THE CITY OF TRENTON, RACHEL HUNDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Maciol et al
as 6:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Defendant:
Robert Maciol, Oneida County Sheriff's Department, Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alto et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02676
Plaintiff:
Jaime R. Alto and Angie Alto
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CSAA General Insurance Company v. Branum et al
as 5:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
CSAA General Insurance Company
Defendant:
James R Branum and Martha L Branum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
United States, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
