Cases 31 - 40 of 1,207
Rodrigues v. The Providence Center, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Antonia Rodrigues
Defendant:
The Providence Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Gomes De Almeida, et al. v. Garland
as 24-731
Petitioner:
GILLIARD GOMES DE ALMEIDA, ADENISA RODRIGUES SABARA DOS SANTOS and MAIANY GIULLY RODRIGUES DE ALMEIDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez Then v. US
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUE THEN and LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ THEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Hill v. Wise, et al.
as 24-605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD WISE, Unit Sgt., 2nd-shift, JON COERS, Classification Counselor 1, AARON KERSHAW, Unit Sgt., 3rd-shift and others
Rodriguez-Granados, et al. v. Garland
as 24-629
Petitioner:
REINA RODRIGUEZ-GRANADOS, FRANCISCO MATEO CORTEZ-RODRIGUES and KEYSEL ARIANNA CORTEZ-GRANADOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rodrigues v. Transdev U.S., Inc.
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rodrigues
Defendant:
Transdev U.S., Inc. Doing business as Transdev Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Mason v. Rodrigue et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rochon Lee Mason
Defendant:
Don Paul rodrique, Dupre Marine Transportation, LLC, Don Paul Rodrigue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mason v. Rodrigue et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rochon Lee Mason
Defendant:
Don Paul Rodrigue and Dupre Marine Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
