Cases 31 - 40 of 1,059
Sossamon v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Jimmy S. Smith, Christopher Wiedau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Peoria Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Garrison Lee Peters
Defendant:
Peoria Police Department, Unknown Wadsworth, A Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Joyce McDowell
as 23-6992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, PREA Facility Compliance Manager, MS. COVINGTON, PREA Coordinator of Scotland Correctional Institute, CHIEF AND MANAGER AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Smith et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07455
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Smith and Denise A. M. Smith
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv03258
Petitioner:
Eric S. Smith
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Allison et al
as 5:2023cv04863
Plaintiff:
Adam Martinez
Defendant:
K Allison, J. Robertson, L. Deters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv03061
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOFER S SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
PRESTON S SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
