Cases 31 - 40 of 194
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23393
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SNYDER v. PHILADELPHIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER (PICC) et al
as 2:2022cv03856
Plaintiff:
AQUIL SNYDER and SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER (PICC), UNKNOWN, WARDEN, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. American Security Insurance Com
as 5:2022cv04996
Plaintiff:
Shawn Williams
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02328
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Shawn Williams v. Naveen Rajoli, et al
as 22-1831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
TARA POWERS, Nurse and NAVEEN RAJOLI, Dr., Physician
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03444
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lu v. Budd, et al
as 21-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN LAFRAZIA, SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE, INC., KIMBERLY SUZANNE BUDD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
