Cases 31 - 40 of 418
Reinig et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10663
Plaintiff:
Tina Reinig, Gloria Grover, Mary May and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Teal v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv19026
Plaintiff:
Sheila Teal
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
Brakebill v. Teal et al
as 5:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brakebill
Defendant:
Ronald Teal, Richard Tyler, Mike Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teal v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv10477
Plaintiff:
Sally Teal
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Teal House Coffee & Bakery, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Miranda Jackson
Defendant:
Teal House Coffee & Bakery, LLC and Gerald L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Teal v. Woods et al
as 3:2022cv03879
Plaintiff:
James Teal
Defendant:
South Carolina Dep't of Public Safty, Director Robert Woods, Officer G. E. Littles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Smith v. Prins et al
as 6:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Craig Prins, C/O Drumonet, C/O K. Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix Zikomo v. Teal Johnson
as 22-7260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENDRIX Z. ZIKOMO
Defendant / Appellee:
TEAL JOHNSON, COURTNEY REA, BRITTANY SCOTT and others
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Teal Drones, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Teal Drones, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
