Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Joseph Cottman v. Thomas Richardson, et al
as 14-2894
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH COTTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS RICHARDSON and JEFF BALLENGER
HAZELTON et al v. SOLVAY CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00845
Plaintiff:
MELISSA HAZELTON , LAUREN FOSTER , THOMAS RICHARDSON and others
Defendant:
SOLVAY CHEMICALS, INC., SOLVAY AMERICA, INC., SOLVAY SOLEXIS SPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COTTMAN v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2013cv01793
Defendant:
JEFF BALLENGER, DENNIS DAVIS, THOMAS RICHARDSON and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH COTTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perry v. Borough of Dunmore et al
as 3:2011cv01686
Plaintiff:
Russell Perry
Defendant:
Borough of Dunmore, Michael Lydon, David Aronica and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
D.C. v. Riley et al
as 2:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
D.C.
Defendant:
Gary Riley, Thomas Richardson and Otis Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. MIZE et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Defendant:
DAVID BARR, LT BROOKS, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rowe v. Mize et al
as 3:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Rowe
Defendant:
Brett Mize , Bruce Helming , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fields v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv01168
Plaintiff:
Nathson E. Fields
Defendant:
City of Chicago, County of Cook, Office of Cook County State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PN Developers, LLC v. Hanly Home Improvement et al
as 2:2009cv10976
Defendant:
Hanly Home Improvement and Thomas Richardson
Plaintiff:
PN Developers, L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
