Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Eggers #198846 v. Curran et al
as 2:2021cv00803
Defendant:
Walter Hensley, Unknown Brewer, Orin Romney and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Eggers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17622
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goff #186716 v. Thompson et al
as 2:2021cv00669
Defendant:
Unknown Patino, Unknown Lopez, Anthony Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONKLIN v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT CONKLIN
Defendant:
DEAN ROBINSON, LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION and WILLIAM HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00436
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Travis Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Al Saud #108844 v. Scott et al
as 2:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Unknown Brewer, Kenneth Herman, Unknown Marquez and others
Plaintiff:
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Klalid Bin Talal Al Saud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons #321572 v. Hensley et al
as 2:2020cv02357
Defendant:
Walter Hensley, Travis Scott, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Lavelle Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EATON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05487
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT EATON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95305
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kontrolfreek, LLC v. Webster et al
as 1:2020cv03882
Defendant:
Jacques Webster, Cactus Jack Enterprises, LLC, Cactus Jack Records LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kontrolfreek, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
