Cases 31 - 40 of 43
JONES et al v. BALDWIN et al
as 3:2011cv00131
Defendant:
Mayor Al BALDWIN, CITY OF VINCENNES, CITY OF VINCENNES BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY and others
Plaintiff:
TROY JONES and TROY JONES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Jone
as 11-2936
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lance Jones, Lonnie Jones, AKA LT, Aaron Harris, AKA Dog, AKA Toast, AKA DMX, AKA Hit Man Sosa and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Luke Jones, AKA Mega
Jones v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02269
Shield No. 1511:
Police Officer Joseph Gallo
Plaintiff:
Troy Jones
Defendant:
The City of New York and The New York Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Druva v. New Mexico Department of Health et al
as 1:2010cv01216
Plaintiff:
Susan Brooks Druva
Defendant:
New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute , Daniel McCombs , Sean Killoran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Bruvold v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
Rollie Bruvold
Defendant:
Troy Jones and Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaheen Cabbagestalk v. Ms. Tyler
as 08-6339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAHEEN CABBAGESTALK
Defendant - Appellee:
MS. TYLER, JOHNY SAPP, TROY JONES and others
Cabbagestalk v. Bostic et al
as 3:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
Dwan Bostic, Kitchen Supervisor Reeves, Marlboro County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cabbagestalk v. Tyler et al
as 3:2007cv02313
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
Ms Tyler, Johnny Sapp, Troy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
