Cases 31 - 40 of 306
Poor v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
William Poor
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, W. Lawless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Tyner et al
as 6:2022cv04571
Plaintiff:
Tito L. Knox and Jeremiah Lamb
Defendant:
Tyner, Psy Landus, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Knox v. Herlong et al
as 6:2022cv04392
Plaintiff:
Tito L. Knox and Jeremiah Lamb
Defendant:
Henry M Herlong, Jr, Sergo Shanze, Maxwell Cauthen, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Willis v. Tyner et al
as 3:2022cv02418
Plaintiff:
Louis Jacob Willis
Defendant:
Richard Reyes Tyner, Aladdin Transportation Company, Schneider National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TYNER v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
CARLTON B TYNER
Defendant:
SGT PAUL THOMAS, C/O GIBSON, C/O GOLPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tyner et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2022cv01880
Plaintiff:
Roland Tyner and Cheryl Tyner
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
HALL v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, B. RUDZIENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR A. BROWN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN WALKER, CHAPLAIN LEWIS, C.O. 1 COSTELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sloat et al
as 3:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Ardell Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Sloat, Beltz, M Tyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
