Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Hurt v. Boasberg, et al
as 15-1110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BOASBERG, US District Court Judge, US SECRET SERVICE and DC COUNCIL
Samimi v. NAI-Plotkin/NAI-Global, et al
as 14-1990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEHZAD A. SAMIMI
Defendant - Appellee:
NAI-PLOTKIN/NAI-GLOBAL, EVAN PLOTKIN, President of NAI-Plotkin / NAI-Global, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Harrison v. State of New York et al
as 2:2014cv01296
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Jhounelle Cunningham, Anthony Dicaprio and others
Plaintiff:
Malek Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavern Berryhill v. USA, et al
as 13-5014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Supreme Court Justices, 10th Circuit Judges and others
Wilkerson v. US Secret Service and agents et al
as 1:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charlene D. Wilkerson
Defendant:
US Secret Service and agents, Gina Cook, Jimmy Albright and others
Tyrone Hurt v. US Secret Service, et al
as 12-4314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
US SECRET SERVICE, et. al. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
Tyrone Hurt v. US Secret Service, et al
as 12-4281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
US SECRET SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lamar v. US Federal Government et al
as 3:2012cv00713
Plaintiff:
Susan L. Lamar
Defendant:
US Federal Government, FBI/DOJ, DHS/US Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BERRYHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012mc00533
Plaintiff:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, 10th CIRCUIT JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Perales v. US Secret Service et al
as 1:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
US Secret Service, United States of America, State of Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
