Cases 31 - 40 of 5,863
Franklin Wright v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1614
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WRIGHT
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Marcus Satterfield v. Timothy Vaughn
as 24-6298
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
TIMOTHY VAUGHN
Roosevelt Smith v. Cell Search Team, et al
as 24-11006
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT SMITH
Defendant:
CELL SEARCH TEAM, DALE VAUGHN, BOBBY J. GREEN and others
Marshall v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2024cv02485
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Vaughn, Parole Officer Kevin Harmer, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 24-1917
Plaintiff:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Federal Agency at USP Tucson
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd et al v. Deadwood Tobacco Company et al
as 5:2024cv05017
Defendant:
Deadwood Tobacco Company, Deadwood Tobacco Company Corporation and William Rectenwald
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Boyd and SWI-DE, LLC doing business as Drew Estate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Bernard Ellerbe v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1526
Plaintiff:
BERNARD D. ELLERBE
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Thomas Vaughn v. USA
as 24-10850
Petitioner:
THOMAS ALLEN VAUGHN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lindsey v. R P D C Medical Dept et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jamie H Lindsey
Defendant:
Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center, Kendra Vaughn and R P D C Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
