Cases 31 - 40 of 1,129
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
King et al v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Tati Abu King, Melvin Lewis Wingate, Toni Heath Johnson and others
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Kay Coles James, John O'Bannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEINSTEIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16304
Plaintiff:
ELIYAHU WEINSTEIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jest Holdings, LLC v. Russack et al
as 1:2023cv04260
Plaintiff:
Jest Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Ira Russack, Henry Weinstein, Ocean Woodruff Development Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
LONGO v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
as 4:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
JOHN LONGO
Defendant:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, MELINDA N COONROD, RICHARD DAVISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONGO v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
as 2:2023cv02841
Plaintiff:
JOHN LONGO
Defendant:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, CHAIRWOMAN MELINDA N. COONROD, COMMISSIONER RICHARD DAVISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Weinstein v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Steven Weinstein
Defendant:
United States of America and Alejandro Mayorkas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
