Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Parks v. USA et al
as 3:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
William A. Parks
Defendant:
USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. USA et al
as 3:2009mc00246
Plaintiff:
William A. Parks
Defendant:
USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Parks et al
as 3:2008cv02027
Plaintiff:
Desiree Williams
Defendant:
Rosie Parks and Estate of William M. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Patrick et al v. Littlefield
as 1:2008cv10658
Plaintiff:
Duval Patrick, Martha Coakely, Mark Delany and others
Defendant:
William A. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
South Carolina, State of v. Parks
as 2:2008cv01068
Defendant:
William A Parks
Plaintiff:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bajakajian v. Halabu et al
as 2:2007cv13730
Plaintiff:
Joe Bajakajian
Defendant:
Shamil Halabu, Shamil Halabu, Brighton, LLC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Phillip Boyd, Keller Williams Lincoln Park Realty and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Roes and Joe Bajakajian
Cross Claimant:
Shamil Halabu and Shamil Halabu
Counter Claimant:
Brighton, LLC and Brighton, LLC
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Shamil Halabu, Shamil Halabu, Brighton, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Parks v. Hampton Falls, Town of et al
as 1:2007cv00173
Plaintiff:
William Alexander Parks
Defendant:
Hampton Falls, Town of and Rockingham County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
