Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Amaker v. Fischer
as 16-2829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark L. Bradt, Supt., Brian S. Fischer, Comm., William Hughes, Dep. Supt. and others
HUGHES v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv04238
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUGHES
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beard et al v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01500
Plaintiff:
William Hugh Beard and Patty Beard
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15275
Plaintiff:
Michele Hughes and William Hughes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Collington v. Alfred Owens, Sr., et al
as 15-7068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Hugh Collington, also known as William Franklin Cave, also known as William F. Cave
Defendant - Appellee:
Alfred A. Owens, Sr. and Morris L. Shearin, Jr.
COLLINGTON v. OWENS et al
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUGH COLLINGTON
Defendant:
ALFRED A. OWENS, SR. and MORRIS L. SHEARIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02493
Plaintiff:
William Hughes and Patty Hughes
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03955
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hughes and William Hughes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes v. Hamburg-Kennedy Photographs et al
as 1:2015cv01340
Plaintiff:
William Hughes
Defendant:
Hamburg-Kennedy Photographs and Marla Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Winkler v. City of Hapeville et al
as 1:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Dana Marie Winkler
Defendant:
City of Hapeville , Alan Hallman , William Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
