Cases 31 - 40 of 30,456
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Wasserman v. Young Consulting, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04119
Plaintiff:
Ann Wasserman
Defendant:
Young Consulting, LLC and California Physicians' Service doing business as Blue Shield of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Carter et al v. Molock et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Dominick Adrian Carter, C.C. a Minor, c/o April Simon, A.C. a Minor, c/o April Simon and others
Defendant:
Matthew R. Leepa, Norman W. Rogers, Sharod Molock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Young v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv01557
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Petitioner:
Darryl William Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
YOUNG et al v. DOE
as 2:2024cv04875
Plaintiff:
CORDELL YOUNG, MICHAEL SANTIAGO and CURTIS MAHAFFEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Gothard
as 9:2024cv05049
Respondent:
Kelly Gothard
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Higgins Family Trust v. Haaland et al
as 2:2024cv01664
Defendant:
Kevin McMahill, David Rhodes, Timothy Patrick Brislin and others
Plaintiff:
Higgins Family Trust
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Young v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as GAN/1:24-cv-03185
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC and AT&T Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Young
Interested Party:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Young
as 3:2024cv06429
Plaintiff:
Timothy Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
