Cases 31 - 40 of 3,705
Bradford v. Fed Ex
as 5:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Donald Dante Bradford
Defendant:
Fed Ex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1270
Not Yet Classified:
In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, CORTEVA INC., DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., New DuPont and others
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02472
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, za_98392, zhulvyemin and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Stratfs, LLC (f/k/a Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC)
as 24-727
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant:
STRATEGIC CLIENT SUPPORT, LLC, formerly known as Pioneer Client Services, LLC, STRATEGIC FS BUFFALO, LLC, STRATEGIC NYC, LLC and others
Blankenship, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6053
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAYDEN BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), HAYLEE BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), DELSIE MAY PYE, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leon W Pye; (DC Grady Co. PB-2022-19) and others
Defendant:
JOHN KEVIN STITT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, ADAM LUCK, individually and as former Board Member of Pardon and Parole Board and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Stratfs,
as 24-719
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General and others
Defendant:
THE BLUST FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST THROUGH DONALD J. HOLMGREN, TRUSTEE, Relief Defendant, STRATFS, LLC, formerly known as Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC, STRATEGIC CLIENT SUPPORT, LLC, formerly known as Pioneer Client Services, LLC and others
OH Bureau of Workers' Comp., et al v. SEC
as 24-1631
Petitioner:
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Commonwealth of Kentucky, ex rel. Attorney General Russell Coleman and State of Tennessee, ex rel. Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti
Respondent:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Blust
as 24-583
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General and others
Defendant:
JASON BLUST, STRATFS, LLC, formerly known as Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC, STRATEGIC CLIENT SUPPORT, LLC, formerly known as Pioneer Client Services, LLC and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Moore Legal Group, LLC
as 24-554
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General and others
Defendant:
MOORE LEGAL GROUP, LLC, CLEAR CREEK LEGAL, LLC, CREDIT ADVOCATES LAW FIRM, LLC and others
Swank v. Regional University System of the Oklahoma Board of Regents
as 6:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Noreen W. Swank
Defendant:
Regional University System of the Oklahoma Board of Regents State of Oklahoma (ex rel) - State of Oklahoma doing business as Northeastern State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
