Cases 41 - 50 of 6,416
(PC) Harper v. Powell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B Powell, S. Arana, J Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Marinez et al
as 3:2024cv50143
Plaintiff:
Amber Harper
Defendant:
Judge Francis Marinez, Samantha Hagerman and Alesha Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEBB v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
DEREK LEE WEBB
Respondent:
JILL E. RANGOS, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jarett v. Garnett, Kansas, City of, et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reese Jarett and Reese Jarett
Defendant:
Garnett, Kansas, City of, Anderson County, Kansas, Les McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hill, Stephen Donald Delcuze, Julio Delgado and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Shade v. Harper Woods, City of
as 2:2024cv10976
Plaintiff:
Daevon Shade
Defendant:
Harper Woods, City of
Stanton v. Welcome et al
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Devon Ray Stanton
Defendant:
Dep. Cory S. Welcome, Dep. Harper and Berkeley County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Harper et al
as 2:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Dorzell King
Defendant:
Jacob Harper and QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harpers Pharmacy, Inc. v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Harpers Pharmacy, Inc. DBA Ameripharma
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
TROUPE v. SUNDAY et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN TROUPE
Defendant:
SGT SUNDAY, SUPERINTENDENT ORLANDO HARPER and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
