Cases 41 - 50 of 4,066
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAUILUS INSURANCE COMPANY v. KLUB VIBEZ LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
NAUILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KLUB VIBEZ, LLC, JAVARIUS MCCRAY, VAN LUCAS MCCLOUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
McKinney v. USA
as 4:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Corey Shamon McKinney
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
McKinney v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10822
Plaintiff:
Franklin McKinney
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Bryan D. McKinney
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John and Jane Does A, B and C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ivan McKinney v. Talia Ryan, et al
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
TALIA RUBEL RYAN, REBECCA SANTIAGO, WILLIAM LEONARD and others
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
