Cases 41 - 50 of 400
Hill v. Arbogast et al
as 3:2020cv00722
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation, Captain Arbogast and West Virginia Division of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James M. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rauch v. WVDCR et al
as 2:2020cv00502
Defendant:
Donald F. Ames, WVDCR, Cpl. Deven Lilly and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan L. Rauch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Saunders v. Frame et al
as 2:2020cv00220
Plaintiff:
Quantel Saunders
Defendant:
John Frame, Scott Smith, Richard Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metheney v. Deepwell Energy Services, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Tug Hill Operating, LLC, John Doe, Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation and others
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Metheney
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Group Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rauch v. Critchley et al
as 2:2020cv00284
Defendant:
Capt. Richard Toney, WVDCR, LT Andrew Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Lawrence Rauch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Hall et al
as 2:2019cv00901
Defendant:
Mike Fridley, Nick Callison, Nicholas Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill et al v. The United States Of America
as 1:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hill and Kelley R. Hill
Defendant:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hill v. The United States of America
as 3:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
Steven Hill
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Oak Hill Hometown Pharmacy v. Dhillon et al
as 2:2019cv00716
Respondent:
United States Drug Enforcment Administration and Uttam Dhillon
Petitioner:
Oak Hill Hometown Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
