Cases 41 - 50 of 261,327
Reed v. Lauderdale County
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Dekoyius L. Reed, Sr
Defendant:
Lauderdale County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mac Project LLC v. High Lonesome Claims et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mac Project LLC
Defendant:
High Lonesome Claims, High Lonesome Mining, Inc, Richard W. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mac Project LLC v. High Lonesome Claims et al
as 2:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Mac Project LLC
Defendant:
High Lonesome Claims, High Lonesome Mining, Inc, Richard W. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TODD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06283
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENIECE L. TODD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McLaughin v. Livingston County PD et al
as 6:2024cv06314
Plaintiff:
Casey McLaughin, Sr.
Defendant:
Livingston County PD and L. Babeswski Laslo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealom v. University Circle Police Department et al.
as 1:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Ealom
Defendant:
University Circle Police Department, Judson Manor/Judson Senior Living/Judson Senior Living Communities, Glover Roston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcum v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
as 2:2024cv02645
Petitioner:
Jennifer L Marcum
Respondent:
Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CSAA General Insurance Company v. Branum et al
as 5:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
CSAA General Insurance Company
Defendant:
James R Branum and Martha L Branum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
MILLER v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Shonn L Miller
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
