Cases 41 - 50 of 28,078
Woodrow v. Tango Fiber, INC
as 3:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Aaron Woodrow
Defendant:
TANGO FIBER, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Beard et al v. Trinchero CIHC, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Reagan Mackenzie Beard, Aaron Franklin Anthony and Geoffrey Daniel Rockwell
Defendant:
Trinchero CIHC, LLC, Menage a Trois Wine & Spirits, TFE Logistics Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Elghembri v. Cook et al
as 3:2024cv02770
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Aaron Cook and Alison Pachynski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrus et al v. Spears et al
as 2:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Andrus and Kamryn M Andrus
Defendant:
Rose Ann B Spears and Kendra M Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH et al
as 5:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
EDWIN GEORGE PFURSICH, IV and CODY PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasniak v. Arnette et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jasniak
Defendant:
Aaron Arnette, Trevor Milleson, Robert Kirchner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEUTHE v. BUBASH
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
AARON LEUTHE
Defendant:
CATHLEEN BUBASH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. Wolcott
as 1:2024cv00448
Petitioner:
Aaron Welch
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
