Cases 41 - 50 of 24,447
Wilson v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03637
Plaintiff:
Alan D Wilson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Young v. Wright et al.
as 9:2024cv03114
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Honorable Alan Wilson, Donald J Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Babb v. David Isom
as 24-1456
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY BABB
Defendant:
DAVID ISOM, General Manager for Safe Harbor, RUDY SOCHA, CEO, Wounded Nature Working Veterans, JOHN J. TECKLENBURG, Retired and others
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kazanas v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alan Kazanas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alan Wyman v. Christine Brannon-Dortch
as 24-1871
Petitioner:
ALAN WYMAN
Respondent:
CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden
Shanishchara v. Model N, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02994
Plaintiff:
Kunal Shanishchara
Defendant:
Model N, Inc., Baljit Dail, Tim Adams and others
Troka v. McCown et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ethan Troka
Defendant:
Patrick McCown, North Central Unit Chaple, Jeffery Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
