Cases 41 - 50 of 424
Price v. Eagle, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Price
Defendant:
Rust Engineering & Construction, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company, Eagle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GIVENS-BEY v. FNU - CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE GIVENS-BEY, IV
Defendant:
FNU - CARTER, FNU - REVELS, FNU - ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engle v. Theiss Motor Sports, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv04193
Plaintiff:
LOUIS ENGLE
Defendant:
THEISS MOTOR SPORTS, INC, ARTHUR LEE DOWELL and Theiss Motor Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gates v. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2021cv00870
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Gates
Defendant:
Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. DVA Martinsburg
as 21-2364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MARTINSBURG, NAGE (SEIU), SUSAN ANDERSON and others
Arthur Garrison v. A. Gregerson, et al
as 21-16871
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE GARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. GREGERSON, D. NEVEN, ROMEO ARANAS and others
Arthur Garrison v. John Keast, et al
as 21-16872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE GARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KEAST and WALLS, Dr.
Defendant:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Nevada Department of Corrections
Arthur ChandlerIn re: Arthur Chandler
as 21-6002
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR LEE CHANDLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arthur Dukes v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-13203
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE DUKES
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Lee v. Inch, et al
as 5:2021cv00354
In Re:
E. Hurst
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Lee
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Jon Doe, JHON DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
