Cases 41 - 50 of 387
NEADEAU v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LEE NEADEAU
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parker v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv11684
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
Defendant:
Brandon Lee, Lance Thompson, Krueger and others
Bauguess v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections et al
as 5:2023ct03201
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Bauguess
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections, Medical Staff, Dental Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22643
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LEE MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brandon Lee Clark v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Clark
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Newkirk, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nowlin #339596 v. Board of Clemency et al
as 2:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Nowlin
Defendant:
Board of Clemency, Sal Freni and Luis Quinunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nowlin #339596 v. Black Canyon Regional Parole Office
as 2:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Nowlin
Defendant:
Black Canyon Regional Parole Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Sherrie Ina Wilson
Defendant:
Brandon Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nowlin #339596 v. Freni et al
as 2:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Nowlin
Defendant:
Sal Freni and Louis Quinunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
