Cases 41 - 50 of 3,220
Merrival v. Pennington County et al
as 4:2024cv04064
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Merrival, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennington County, Kellie Wasko, Amber Pirraglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tripathy v. Lockwood
as 24-837
Plaintiff:
SANJAY TRIPATHY, -
Defendant:
Captain LOCKWOOD, Reverand HARRIS, SORC R. HOFFMAN, IGRC Chairperson and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sainiak v. Newberry et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Garrett Raymond Sainiak
Defendant:
Newberry, Rainer, A. Webrzynowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SCI FOREST et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER LEWIS
Defendant:
SCI FOREST, WELLPATH, NP Eleanor Dorrion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. CDCR, C-14 C.O Carillo et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Derrik Blanton
Defendant:
CDCR, C-14 C.O Carillo and All Jhon Doe Officers or Agencys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christian Smith
Defendant:
Chae Harris, C.O. McKinley, C.O. J. Umstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
