Cases 41 - 50 of 53
BANKS et al v. NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00654
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS and KENNETH POSNER
Defendant:
NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DANIEL PANTALEO, HON. JOY FLOWERS CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv03012
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Boykin v. McMahon, et al
as 1:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boykin
Defendant:
Colleen McMahon and Kenneth M. Karas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Latonya Finley v. Thomas Reardon, et al
as 14-16474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATONYA R. FINLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS REARDON, Judge, COLLEEN MCMAHON, District Attorney, THOMAS ROGERS, Judge and others
Finley v. Reardon et al
as 3:2014cv00908
Petitioner:
Latonya R. Finley
Respondent:
Thomas Reardon, Colleen McMahon, Thomas Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
