Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Doe I et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00275
Plaintiff: John Doe I , John Doe II , John Doe III and others
Defendant: Boys Scouts of America, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Haigler v. Grand Canyon Education Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01230
Plaintiff: David Haigler
Defendant: Grand Canyon Education Incorporated , Grand Canyon University Incorporated , Christopher Richardson and others
Movant: Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. McClure Design and Build Contractors, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02699
Plaintiff: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Defendant: McClure Design and Build Contractors, LLC and Cintas Corporate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00620
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Herbert v. Thornton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00607
Plaintiff: Justin Herbert
Defendant: Trevor Thornton, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints , National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corporation Of The Presiding Bishop Of The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints v. The City of Mission, et al
as 7:2011cv00326
Plaintiff: Corporation Of The Presiding Bishop Of The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints
Defendant: The City of Mission and The City Council of the City of Mission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosemore v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 3:2011cv00014
Plaintiff: Ben E. Rosemore
Defendant: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints , Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and Jacob D. Eliason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
as 2:2011cv00020
Plaintiff: George Ann Young
Defendant: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints , Shelter Mutual Insurance Company and Kenneth Nietfield
Cross_claimant: Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Cross_defendant: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Kenneth Nietfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tom Doe v. Corporation of the Presiding, et al
as 10-80199
Plaintiff - Respondent: TOM DOE, an individual proceeding under a pseudonym
Defendant - Petitioner: CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a foreign corporation sole registered to do business in the State of Oregon and CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a foreign corporation sole registered to do business in the State of Oregon
3 North, PLLC v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00669
Plaintiff: 3 North, PLLC and 3 North, PLLC
Defendant: Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?