Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Ocampo v. Corizon LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Lance Gordan Ocampo
Defendant:
Corizon LLC , Dianna Collins, Amy Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COSGROVE et al v. VEOLIA ES INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY COSGROVE , TODD JOHNSON , ROCCO FURFERO and others
Defendant:
VEOLIA ES INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. , VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC , VEOLIA ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Refior v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2017cv00976
Defendant:
Eaton, County of, Sarah Crowl, Nicholas Dowker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Refior, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowl v. PeaceHealth et al
as 5:2017cv00005
Defendant:
Wandra Miles and PeaceHealth
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Crowl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CROWL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv02936
Plaintiff:
SANDRA CROWL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROWL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00486
Plaintiff:
SANDRA CROWL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crowl v. Warden
as 3:2017cv01305
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Crowl
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Crowl v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2016cv00413
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Crowl
Defendant:
John Doe, Unknown Helms, Stephanie Lamartiniere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
