Cases 41 - 50 of 260
Richard E. Keasling, II et al v. Dennis Lee Doyel et al
as 8:2021cv01205
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Keasling, II and Laura L. Keasling
Defendant:
Dennis Lee Doyel, Paige Reilly Doyel and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dennis et al v. Nix
as 2:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Dennis Lee Nix
Plaintiff:
Deena Butler and Kevin Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hogan v. Warden
as 5:2021cv00338
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Hogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Hohol, Dennis v. Western District District Court - Western Wisconsin et al
as 3:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Hohol
Defendant:
And any et al. persons and Western District District Court - Western Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00178
Defendant:
3M Company, The, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roth v. Harris et al
as 1:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Unknown Arnold, Mandy Jane Doe, Mandy Harris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Roth, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hohol, Dennis v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2020cv00873
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Hohol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hohol, Dennis v. Gramstrup, Chris et al
as 3:2020cv00748
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Hohol
Defendant:
Wisconsin Office of Regulation, Attorney Chris Gramstrup and Wisconsin Office of Regulation, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CATER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78872
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS LEE CATER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
