Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kriemelmeyer, Frederick v. Arde, Allen et al
as 3:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Frederick George Kriemelmeyer
Defendant:
Allen Arde, Rex W. Tillerson and U.S. Dept. of State, Chicago Passport Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WALKER v. TILLERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00732
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS R. WALKER
Defendant:
REX TILLERSON and DIRECTOR OF PASSPORT SERVICES, DEPT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Johnson v. Dept of Justice et al
as 6:2017cv01844
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Dept of Justice, Financials, Dept of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leroy Walton v. Georgia Dept Of Driver Svcs, et al
as 17-3643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY WALTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF DRIVER SERVICES, RUTH JOHNSON, MI Secretary of State, GARY JACKSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158
ACOSTA et al v. DEMOCRATIC CITY COMMITTEE et al
as 2:2017cv01462
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO A. ACOSTA and EDWARD LLOYD
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC CITY COMMITTEE, EMILIO VAZQUEZ, CARLOS MATOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. State of New York et al,
as 3:2017cv01287
Defendant:
State of New York, New York State Dept. of State Committee on Open Government, Andre M. Cuomo and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driver v. U.S. Special Master et al
as 1:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver
Defendant:
U.S. Special Master, Clark Kelso, U.S. Dept. of State Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Hatley v. United States Dept of State et al
as 2:2017cv00818
Respondent:
Wesley Burkholter and United States Dept of State
Petitioner:
William Hatley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
