Cases 41 - 50 of 2,741
Murphy v. Fader et al
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
Chief of Staff, Mr. Craig Fader and All Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. Stocksdale et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
Ms Brandi Stocksdale and Staff Members
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. Shuman et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
Ruth Shuman and Any staff member that was involved
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 US as Defendant
State of Oklahoma v. Thompson
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Donell Thompson, Jr. doing business as Donnell Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Bolden v. Raoul et al
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Heidi Epperson, Elaine Bochenek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Donnell Devonte Sanders
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Hub Group Dedicated, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Louis Francisco Garcia
Defendant:
Hub Group Dedicated, LLC, Hub Group Trucking, Inc., Hub Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Donnell G. Haddock v. Justice et al
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Donnell G. Haddock
Defendant:
Dr. Justice, Dr. Cruz, Dr. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spiehs v. Lewis et al
as 5:2023cv04121
Plaintiff:
Dr. Justin Spiehs and Justin Spiehs
Defendant:
anthony lewis, alyse donnell, kelly jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Stokes v. USA
as 23-14146
Petitioner:
DAVID DONNEL STOKES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
