Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 174
Rice v. Williams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00130
Petitioner: Christopher Rice
Respondent: Douglas Williams
Not Classified By Court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webster Williams, III v. Michael Carvajal
as 22-6495
Plaintiff / Appellant: WEBSTER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, III
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Amicus Curiae: ARC OF THE UNITED STATES, MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA and NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS NETWORK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00887
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02215
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Arnold v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00417
Petitioner: Douglas William Arnold
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Lyn
as 5:2021hc02151
Petitioner: Webster Douglas Williams, III
Respondent: Warden Tamara Lyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Rogers
as 2:2021cv02230
Respondent: Sammy Rogers and Warden Douglas Williams
Petitioner: Brandon Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OUELLETTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12385
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS WILLIAM OUELLETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02671
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS WILLIAM FORCE
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09027
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?