Cases 41 - 50 of 3,074
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc., FedEx Corporation and Federal Express FSC Merger Sub, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Titus v. Rihanna, et al
as 6:2024cv06045
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and Iamsui
Defendant:
Rihanna, Nikki Minaj, Eminem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DRAKE v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04265
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE DRAKE
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drake v. MS Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Drake
Defendant:
MS Dept. of Corrections, Kitchen Supervisor Unknown Collier, Mrs., Food Service Manager Mary Williams, Mrs. and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Stephanie Nicole Mitchell, Chika Anyiam, Dallas County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation, Walter Craig Jelinek, John C Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
