Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Gordon, John v. Humphreys, Robert
as 3:2017cv00444
Petitioner:
John E. Gordon
Respondent:
Robert Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gordon v. Fox
as 1:2017cv00834
Plaintiff:
Alpheous E. Gordon
Defendant:
Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02676
Plaintiff:
Marjorie E Gordon
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente
as 17-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENIECE L.W. KABANDO
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA JAMES BOENTE, United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia, DENNIS CARL BARGHAAN, JR., Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia and STEVEN E. GORDON, Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia
Kabando v. Boente et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Reniece L.W. Kabando
Defendant:
Dana J. Boente, Dennis C. Barghaan, Jr. and Steven E. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Donald Gordon, Jr.
as 16-4441
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald E. Gordon, Jr.
Gordon v. Sells et al
as 1:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
Christine E Gordon
Defendant:
Steven Sells and Ann L. Sells
Counter_claimant:
Steven Sells
Counter_defendant:
Christine E Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Katherine Gordon et al v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv02261
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC, DOES and Oremor of Riverside, LLC
Plaintiff:
Arthur E Gordon and Katherine Gordon
Chance E Gordon v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2016cv06069
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Does, The State Bar of California and others
Plaintiff:
Chance E Gordon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
